this site is not up to date rather see http://adibbenjebara.webs.com

 

[e-mail]

 

http://adibbenjebara.webs.com

 

At the level of elementary particles, time could be stopped

The assumption is that at the level of elementary partcles,
time is the infinite set of urelements U of the set theory
with urelements.
If it can be prevented going from the urelement-time u1 to
u2, time would be stopped.
Time at the level of elementary particles is not the arrow
of time that we know at our level.

As a result of what could be happening at the level of
elementary particles, there might be disturbances of
time in an area, at our level, like slowing down.

Adib Ben Jebara.

My story in French/Mon experience de chercheur

J’ai envoyé des e-mails aux professeurs de mathématiques et de physique des universités sur un article dans le Bulletin dela Logique Symbolique de septembre 2008. Ils de répondent pas. 

Le principal problème est que c’est des mathématiques pures appliquées à la cosmologie. Dire que l’accumulation des connaissances a pour conséquence l’évolution de l’organisation sociale est une thèse contre le matérialisme dialectique. La transformation de la société a un lien avec l’avancement des recherches. 

Nous allons aborder la recherche dans les mathématiques, la cosmologie et la physique. Une grande partie de la recherche consiste à mettre des choses connues sous une forme différente qui ne présente pas d’avantages. Si la recherche dans ces disciplines connaissait un avancement rapide, on aurait des applications industrielles comme la téléportation. 

Mais nombre de facteurs freinent la recherche. Les responsables des revues et des forums internet manquent d’ouverture d’esprit et ne laissent pas passer un texte qui peut être controversé. La plupart des chercheurs se sont contentés de suivre une filière sans avoir vraiment la vocation ou bien ils ont la vocation d’enseigner. 

La plupart des chercheurs n’essaient même pas de faire une découverte majeure. La plupart des chercheurs se détournent des idées tout à fait nouvelles, par prudence. Les chercheurs sont étroitement spécialisés et c’est peut-être le facteur qui freine le plus la recherche. Ainsi, les mathématiques pures ne devraient pas rester pures. Les cloisons entre les disciplines font que des phénomènes restent inexpliqués. 

Je ne pense pas que les pensées soient des ondes du cerveau, je pense qu’un jour il y aura une théorie mathématique sur les pensées. Il se pourrait même qu’il y ait, un jour, une théorie mathématique sur l’au delà. Si on  fait appel à la cosmologie pour justifier une hypothèse mathématique, cela ne devrait pas être interdit. Cela peut être transitoire ou permanent. 

Cela ne veut pas dire que mathématiques et physiques vont devenir une seule science mais qu’il y a des points de jonction qui permettent une certaine unification (et non unicité).       La philosophie des sciences a là un objet d’étude. Si un article propose une explication d’un phénomène peu connu, il faut accorder à cet article une certaine valeur. Pour faire des découvertes, il faut traverser les cloisons des sous spécialités et utiliser ce qui n’a pas encore été utilisé. 

Le problème est que tout s’effrite avec le temps. Etre résolu ne résiste pas au temps qui passe. L’insatisfaction s’installe après une satisfaction brève. La recherche ne procure de satisfaction qu’à intervalles. Mais il faut se dire qu’en l’an 3000, on aura probablement trouvé les moyens de fabriquer des corps humains et de restituer des âmes. 

La recherche a donc de beaux jours devant elle. 

DEMANDEZ MOI LA SUITE  [e-mail]

Logic of a Big Bang

  Logic of a Big Bang

The axiom of choice says that an infinite Cartesian product
of non empty sets is non empty.
Set theory with urelements was used to study the negation of
the axiom of choice.
The urelements are non sets and undistinguishable.

Let U be the set of urelements and Ui a set of urelements.
The infinite Cartesian product of U1, U2, U3,…………
is empty if the negation of the axiom of choice is applied.

Let us assume that physical space is U with as elements
locations of elementary particles of quantuum cosmology.
When we consider the empty infinite Cartesian product,
space disappears.

The particles collapse upon themselves. It is a Big Crunch.
The Big Crunch is almost immediatly followed by a Big Bang.
Adib Ben Jebara.

http://www.freewebs.com/adibbenjebara

(search by Google « negation of the axiom of choice »)

Reference :
« About space and time in quantum mechanics » Adib Ben Jebara
Bulletin of Symbolic Logic September 2008 Volume 14,
number 3, pp. 410-411.

In an antanglement, the distance before measurement between
particles is in number of uurelements (number in between +1)
and could be small.
Difference in time itself is in number of urelements and
could be small.

Reference:
« An interpretation about space and time in quantum mechanics »
Adib Ben Jebata The Bulletin of
Symbolic Logic of March 2008 page 154

Regards,
Adib Ben jebara from Tunisia.

Publication on paper

[A text a little different appeared in the Bulletin of
Symbolic  (Abstract for ASL Winter Meeting)
Bulletin of Symbolic Logic September 2008 Volume 14,
number 3, pp. 410-411.

About every day life of the elementary particles (simplified)

About every day life of the elementary particles (simplified)

This is what I think about some of elementary particles behavior,
avoiding much math.

The elementary particle jumps from one location to another with
the set of locations discontinuous and not linearly ordered.
What is far with the standard distance can be near with the jumps.

So, two particles can have an action one on the other after having
taken a « distance » one from the other.
The two particles could be within a limited number of jumps one from
the other.
Therefore, there could be an unexpected correlation.

Time itself is discontinuous and not linearly ordered.
So, there are no causality relationships unless time is ordered by
the observation set up.
Help is welcome for deducing other consequences of this behavior.

Adib Ben Jebara.

About physics and the actual infinite (simplified)

About physics and the actual infinite (simplified) 

About Galileo and about the infinite

After Archimedes, Galilei Galileo applied mathematics to physics.
Alexandre Koyré wrote in « D’un monde clos à l’univers infini » that
Galileo threw Earth in the Sky.
For almost all ancient greeks, the Earth and the Sky were not
connected and mathematics applied only to the Sky.
Nowadays, scientists and philosophers think that the actual infinite
cannot be applied in physics.
So now is the time for furthering of Galileo of applying mathematics
to physics.

Establishing a link between the actual infinite and the Big Bang is
furthering the insight of Galileo.

The physical space is infinite because in assuming so, you can
understand why the Big Bang occured. It is because space vanished
as is applied the negation of the mathematical axiom of choice to
describe space.
It is difficult to imagine the contained without the containing, but
it is what happened because space is infinte in the Big Crunch
followed by the Big Bang.
There was always an universe (in a sequence of universes).
It is not clear whether this theory is confirmed or not as I publish
in « The bulletin of symbolic logic » but without any feedback and I
am not quoted.
Adib Ben Jebara
 

About research

About research

Mathematics are giving shape to the physical world.
To reduce mathematics to logic is like reducing
physics to mathematics.
Mathematics are a way to contemplate Good which is
a way to contemplate God.

The evolution of the philosophy of mathematics is
slow, for instance platonism is always here.

Either set theory will be increasingly used in physics
and other sciences or it will remain just a part of
mathematics.
What will happen is probably something in the middle
with isolated researchers finding out how to apply it.

There will be more set theory taught and less logic
as set theory will show even more its usefulness in
the remaining parts of mathematics.

Platonism will be more spread because less dogmatic
about what exists.

Nowadays, research in mathematics and in philosophy of
mathematics make complicated things even more so.
This occurs as a lack of creativity.
Some are fatalist about it, thinking that the great
theories are already made.
The future will contradict them as new theories will
appear.
The new theories are not always accepted at once.

About a distance for elementary particles

About a distance for elementary particles

In « An interpretation about space and time in quantum mechanics »
in Logic Colloquium 2007, we have seen that the usual distance
is not defined for space and time because we apply the theory
ZFU (set theory with urelements).
We explained some correlations between particles.

I would have doubts about the assumptions if I did not apply them
for space successfully to explain the Big Crunch and the Big Bang
in
http://adibjebara.blogspot.com/
As time is but another dimension, I apply ZFU to time as well.

Now, let U1xU2 be space time with U1 space and U2 time.

Many things are discontinuous in quantum mechanics. So, why not
space and time ?
At the level of elementary particles, space and time are also
not linearly ordered.
As the experiment set up gives us meters and seconds, that means
that the space and time considered by the experiment set up are
the space and time at our level.

I conjecture that when we measure, we introduce, finitely, order of
urelements in U1 and U2, in a laboratory.
A distance is number of urelements in between + 1
which is converted to the measurement at our level in meters and
seconds.
The experiment set up changes much what exists as space and time.

The skeptics should be aware that some experiments needed
interpretations and I provided them.

As a Platonist, I see some reality in Dedekind cardinals and, thus,
in ZFU.

There is already an experiment where a particle goes both two
separate ways. So, its space is different from ours.

There remain to find other experiments to detect that locations and
times are not linearly ordered.
There remains also to comment on the lack of localism.

I thank Mr Andereas Blass and Mr Abderazak Abadlia for their comments.
Adib Ben Jebara
Apt F3 Residence Badr Manar 1 Tunis 2092 Tunisia
[e-mail]

About experimenting about elementary particles about space and time

About experimenting about elementary particles about space and time

That ZFU (set theory with urelements) is applied to space and time
explains the correlations between particles (in « An interpretation
bout space and time in quantum mechanics ») in Logic Colloquium 2007.

ZFU applied to elementary particles is most likely to explain
the Big Bang, see
http://adibjebara.blogspot.com/

As the usual distance is not defined, we consider the distance
between particles
number of urelements in between + 1
Mr Andreas Blass remarked that if the urelements are ordered by the
experiment set up,  measurement may vary with the order when the
conversion to meters and seconds is made.
But it seems to me that , whatever the order of urelements, the
number of urelements in between + 1 stay the same.
After a comment from Mr Andreas Blass, I feel the need to precise
that the first and the last extremities of the sequence are not
to be changed as they are associated to particles.

I see the order between urelements as a distortion made by the
experiment set up.
The experiment set ups are so sophisticated that they can detect
what exists but that might be with a distortion especially for
space and time which are invisible.

The experiment set up probably makes a particle move in a straight
line.
Without the experiment set up, may be the particle moves in
approximately a straight line.

We can say that we do not know what the particles do by themselves
even if we know what they do when we make them appear to us.

Mathematics help us see things as they are, without an experiment
set up interfering but then experiment set ups are necessary
because If mathematics and experiment set ups agree on some thing,
then that is where the truth is.

Adib Ben Jebara
Apt F3 Residence Badr Manar 1 Tunis 2092 Tunisia
[e-mail]